Freedom of Speech and Nigerian Democracy: Perspectives From J. S. Mill's Notion of Free Speech

Authors

  • Jennifer Emejulu, PhD Department of Philosophy, Federal University of Lafia, Nigeria
  • Egbonu, John Okwuchukwu, PhD Department of Philosophy, St. Albert's Institute Fayit, Kaduna, Nigeria

Abstract

The recent happenings in Nigeria's democratic government where
freedom of speech and expression have come under heavy attack and
criticisms both from within and outside the country is a cause for
concern. This attack comes in form of anti-democratic stances or policies
that hinder and deprive the electorate of their democratic privileges and
rights as citizens. The right of expression and speech for every citizen is a
fundamental aspect of every democratic system. In recent times, these
aspects (freedom of speech and expression) have been under threat by the
Nigerian government as considered in this research. The Nigeria system
of democracy hinders freedom of expression, censors the opinions and
criticisms of citizens and opposition parties. How can a nation be
democratic if it does not uphold freedom of speech and expression and
how can freedom of speech be reinstated in Nigeria? In order to address
these questions, the paper adopts a critical analytical method of
philosophy and calls for governmental policies and laws that will
promote freedom and respect for fundamental human rights in Nigeria.
The paper hinges its arguments on J.S Mill's notion of 'liberty and free
speech' to demonstrate the harm of restricting free information and
speech in a democratic government. The conclusion reached in
this paper is that, the promotion of freedom speech and expression would
help to improve government performance and remind leaders that
they are obligated to the citizens.

References

Anniete, Ewang. “Nigeria's Wavering Commitment to Freedom of Expression”

www.hrw.org/news/2019/28/nigeria's-waivering-commitmentfreedom-expression June 2019 accessed 15/12/2021

Appadorai, A. The Substance of Politics. India: Oxford University Press, 2004.

Britannica,The Editors of Encyclopaedia. “Freedom of Speech”.

E n c y c l o p a e d i a B r i t a n n i c a . 1 3 M a r c h , 2 0 2 0 .

https://www.britannica.com/topic/freedom-of-speech. Accessed 16

December 2021

Hume, David. Enquiry into Human Liberty. 1717. Retrieved from

the www.iep.com 9 August, 2021.

Ige Asemudara, “Online Censorship and its Implications of Freedom of

Expression'. June 2021. http://www.vaguardgr.com/2021/06/olie-cesorhip-ad-its-implicatios-of-freedom-of-expressio/

Accessed 15/12/2021

James A. Harris. Of Liberty and Necessity The Freewill Debate in Eighteenth

Century British Philosophy. London: Oxford University Press, 2005.

Lincoln Abraham, Lincoln's Writings on Definition of Democracy. August1,

th

Retrieved from https//housedivided.dickson.edu. on 4

August,2021.

Mill, J.S. On Liberty. Canada: Batoche Books Limited, 1859.

Montesquieu Charles de Secondat Baron. The Spirit of Laws. Manchester Press,

th Online Dictionary. www.onlinedictionary.com. Retrieved on the 4 August,

Riley, Jonathan. “Mill on Liberty”. Routledge Philosophy Guidebooks Edited

by Tim Crane and J. Wolff. London: University College Press, 1998.

Federal Government of Nigeria, The Nigerian Constitution of 1999 as

Ammended.

UNESCO “Freedom of Expression: A Fundamental Human Right

U n d e r p i n n i n g a l l C i v i l L i b e r t i e s ”

en.unesco.org/70years/freedom_of_expression. Accessed 15/12/2021

Uzoka, N. C. Hate Speech and Freedom of Expression: Legal Boundaries in

Nigeria. Library Research Journal, 4(1), 111–118. 2021.Retrieved from

https://journals.unizik.edu.ng/index.php/lrj/article/view/556. Accessed

February 7, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30