BETWEEN PLATO AND FREUD’S THEORY OF HUMAN NATURE
This paper discusses Plato and Sigmund Freud’s conception of human nature. It
is a critical analytic discussion of the fundamental relationship between the two
philosophers’ understanding of a human person. The paper observes that Plato
and Freud’s account of human nature and other existing scholarly accounts of the
subject matter underscore the perennial attempts by human beings to organize
their understanding of the cosmos; to figure out their relation to God, nature, and
other humans; and to uncover the possibilities, meanings and purposes of human
life as a basis for improving the destiny of the human person. The paper contends
that, although there are distinctions and similarities in Plato and Freud’s
conceptions, they do not capture the symbiotic relationship of individuality and
relationality that characterises human nature as a multi-dimensional concept, and
that where they scarcely do, they do not recognize the equal importance that the
two have. In its critical analytic adventure, the paper underscores this symbiotic
relationship and equality of importance, as a basis for underpinning the
ambivalence, dynamism, solidarity and distinctions in the character and
individual/collective disposition to issues that permeate human existence, as we
constantly experience in our society.
Copleston, F. A History of Philosophy. Vol.2. New York: Image Books, 1962.
Bennett, Jonathan, Treatise of Human Nature, USA: The Pennsylvania State
Dinwiddy, H.P. “Creative Spirit? (The Poet).” In What is Man? edited by Eric
Lucas, 76- 93. London: Oxford University Press, 1962
Dubos, Rene, Man Adapting, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980.
Eze, M. “What is African Communitarianism? Against Consensus as a Regulative
Ideal.” South African Journal of Philosophy 27 (2008): 386-399.
Falaiye, Muyiwa. Political Stability: Ideas, Values and Questions, (Lagos: Panaf
Publishing Inc., 1999), 3-15.
Freud, Sigmund. Five Lectures on Psycho-Analysis. Edited with translation by
James Strachey. New York: W.W. Norton and Co. Inc, 1909.
Ikuenobe, P. “An Examination of Menkiti’s Conception of Personhood and
Gyekye’s Critique.” In Method, Substance and the Future of African
Philosophy, edited by Edwin Etieyibo. 188-199. USA: Palgrave Macmillan,
Marx, Karl. “On James Mill”. In Karl Marx: Selected Writings. 2nd edition, edited
by D. McLellan, 124-133. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Menkiti, I. “On the Normative Conception of a Person.” In A Companion to African
Philosophy, edited by Kwasi Wiredu, 324-331. USA: Blackwell Publishing,
Lovejoy, Arthur, Reflections on Human Nature, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins
Lucas, Eric. What is Man? London: Oxford University Press, 1962.
Parkes, R.J. “The Concept of Person”. Second Order: An African Journal of
Philosophy, IX, nos. 1 and 2, (1980) 19-33.
Plato. The Republic, translated with an Introduction by Desmond Lee, London:
Penguin Books Ltd, 1987.
Stevenson, Leslie. Seven Theories of Human Nature, New York: Oxford University
Todd, C. “Creative Spirit? (The Artist)” In What is Man? edited by Eric Lucas, 94-
London: Oxford University Press, 1962.